Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
Yes, agreed, we won’t change each other’s minds. And a good 24% of people surveyed agree with you that he should not be fired.
I agree that it has been poor management of draft capital. Which in the big picture negates any ‘per capita’ draft success ratio or late round successes (which I think most teams have)
And my view on Tre overall (should be / won’t be) is that these things do not exist in isolation. It has been poor management on several fronts.
Thing is I don’t even take as much issue with that assumption (don’t agree that it’s ‘proven to be wrong’ as it can’t be evaluated in isolation) as I do his response to it (apparently failing to identify coaching as a priority, plus I would have to give him overall failing grade in evaluating his roster assets, strengths, weaknesses and needs, and making appropriate moves)
Even if the draft record per capita is okay, it’s not stellar and there are shortfalls in too many other areas for it to matter.
Other than … well, it could be worse. I guess
|
Fair points well made, but in the Flames case on-ice execution has been extremely uneven, and it is hard to manage for that.
On the other hand, if you want to blame bad coaching for that, then maybe there is a good case for a firing.
Could justify either outcome IMO.