Quote:
Originally Posted by MJK
I get the rationale to get rid of trading 1sts you don't own but have we ever in CPHL history have anyone that did not meet a condition? Lot's of way to meet that IMO. Find one, have it waived as part of a future deal, send a package of picks that are equivalent, send a player equivalent...
Like agulati said, I don't think it's an issue until it becomes one.
|
A few years ago we had a situation where the league had to intervene because a condition wasn't being met. But it has been pretty limited.
My concerns are largely that if a GM with tough to meet conditions leaves - basically creates a terrible situation for an incoming GM.
In this case I'm specifically concern because of the fact it's a top 15 in a draft where one GM already owns 9 of the picks.