Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
OK, but I still maintain that this explanation makes no sense whatsoever. Even leaving aside the notion that someone would be "positive for rum" - as if that's a thing anyone has ever said in the history of the English language - the notion that having a shirtless picture of a guy on the shelf behind you would entail that you've had too much to drink is such a total non sequitur that it doesn't even qualify as a joke.
I guess I'll believe him because it's not like he has a history of saying this kind of stuff the way Cherry does but... yeah. Still makes no sense.
|
Bieksa said “I’m positive” first so Maclean tried to tie it together as positive for somethin. It was a joke that fell flat. Trying to make it make sense is senseless.