Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
That's how I see it. Pinder has a point about Monahan's value cratering to the point his contract is now negative value. And I agree that a Monahan trade likely means you're taking salary back on a similar player looking to bounce back.
But then suggesting Seattle might not take him for free? Not many 26 year old centres who have the potential to score 30 goals will be available in expansion.
Anyway they were debating the actual hockey angle, not taking things personally.
|
See...i don't believe that for a second. Since he came into the NHL 16 guys in the entire league have scored more goals than him...16....thats it.
You dont just lose that ability at age 26 unless there is something else at play, like injuries. And Pinder thinks that he has a negative trade value? Its laughable.
But Pinder is "that guy" where he is so ridiculously stuck on his takes, he becomes a smarmy prick even when he is cooked in a debate.