Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
Depends on your lens. Problem is, IMO, in terms of role, it was supposed to be
Tanev for Hamonic (upgrade)
Andersson for Brodie (next step forward)
Andersson was not ready and got paid early
To me, paying Talbot for 3 years plus keeping Brodie would have been better than losing Brodie and adding Markstrom
|
Don't think so. We would have still missed the playoffs, Brodie would have been a lightning rod of critism for his turnovers and soft plays and we would be complaining about Tre's incompetence at getting a true #1, listing all of the crap goalies we've had since Kipper...
Signing Markstrom and prioritizing him over Brodie was not a mistake.