Quote:
Originally Posted by Mull
Are you joking?
The current situation with what has been stated, true or not:
-A player thinks he needed medical treatment and it was withheld by the team NOT TRUE...only to take a different treatment than surgery
-The player played the entire season NOT TRUE
You're arguing that the club didn't tell him to play without the treatment by refusing it, because... it wasn't explicitly stated?
And the key point is, therefore, based on his comments posted on the first post of this thread, its not shameful to call him a "me me me" player?
|
The team never made him play against his will...period. Thats why he hasnt played in 2 months.
Dont know what else you are so triggered about.
The team did not "withhold" treatment either, they just wanted a different one. They were never asking him to play, only to not get surgery.
They owe him 50 Million dollars no matter what, so yes they absolutely get a say in which way that should go, particularly if their doctors think one is better than the other.
It is entirely within their rights to do so as collectively bargained with the NHLPA. If he doesnt like their decision, he can file a grievance.