Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
He did?
I havent seen a single thing where it is alleged that they were "forcing him to play" at any point nor through any injury.
Do they agree on the course to take treatment wise? No.
But that is miles apart from what you are insinuating.
This is what happens with guaranteed contracts...those that are responsible to pay them get say on every aspect of that players health, treatment, and rehab if necessary.
|
Are you joking?
The current situation with what has been stated, true or not:
-A player thinks he needed medical treatment and it was withheld by the team
-The player played the entire season
You're arguing that the club didn't tell him to play without the treatment by refusing it, because... it wasn't explicitly stated?
And the key point is, therefore, based on his comments posted on the first post of this thread, its not shameful to call him a "me me me" player?