Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
1. He is not qualified to discuss this subject with a fighter pilot.
|
Nothing West says requires him to be a fighter pilot. Did you watch the video?
Quote:
2. There is nothing to respond to - Fravor's account and the instrument readings/video is considered a "fact" by the State.
3. There is, obviously, debate about what it in fact means.
|
Of course there is something to respond to. Fravor called West stupid and he felt a need to show that he knows what he's talking about. West could be wrong, but he's just putting out a hypothesis, and he'd be happy to be proven so if the evidence existed.
Quote:
|
A lot of "sceptics" and people in this thread are making the mistake of equating "UFO" (or "UAP" or whatever DOD calls it) with "OMG, ALIENS!" The important subject here is the issue of technology, not ET's.
|
I'm not. Unidentified Flying Objects could be anything, including a balloon. Fravor is conflating his training to identify a known aircraft with an ability to identify an unknown airborne object. Perspective, parallax, and any other optical illusion can make you unable to understand what you're seeing.