What people say is not evidence of anything; people are fallible, memories change.
You also shift from people and put "instruments" in there as well when that wasn't the case at least with the videos that have been discussed; there isn't corroborating radar recordings for example.
Saying a person is trained to recognize airplanes implies they can't be fooled (humans are easy to fool) is just an appeal to authority, also not evidence.
What qualifies as actual evidence isn't controversial.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|