Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
It is pretty obvious that the Flames dominate a stat that does not relate to winning hockey games but somehow suggest the Flames weak shot attempts should have them win this game 3-2.
So what is the value of you posting this:
The Flames are the #2 team in the North Division in SAT%. The first team is Montreal, who is #2 in the whole league.... plan the parade route down Crescent Street
the stats you are hanging your hat on are meaningless as far as winning or even being a decent team.
|
Stats are recorded.
I present them.
I gave colour by not only pointing out the scoring chance splits, but by also talking down the expected goal splits by suggesting it was due more to shot volume than chances.
You are way off base.
The whole tone of the article was around not generating chances, and not scoring goals. You're focusing on the actual stats that have no commentary in them at all.
Very strange.
Some quotes from my game story ...
Quote:
|
Have the play territorially, but don’t muster anything by way of scoring chances
|
Quote:
|
Honestly it’s what we expect these days as the Flames, a team that hadn’t generated a lot of offence to start the year anyway, has learned how to be better in their own zone and with the downside being an even greater loss to offenc
|
Quote:
|
Statistically, the Jets had the period’s only five on five high danger chance.
|
Quote:
|
Flames out shoot the Jets 10-5, but once again don’t get a single high danger chance five on five.
|
Quote:
|
Grinding away, not giving up much, but generating nothing.
|
Think you're barking up the wrong tree if you think I was presenting the idea that the Flames were robbed last night.
You can be an odd duck my friend.