Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
I don't think the issue is Parros really, or the NHL not giving a crap. I just don't think it should be on any one single person's shoulders. Have a committee. At this point, of course you fire Parros because it is an obvious 'miss' on discipline, but you don't replace him with someone else.
I think better consistency will be achieved by having a committee - let's say 9 people. Could be a mix of former players, former referees, whatever.
|
Just to nitpick one thing. I don’t think you truly need a committee, but rather a smart law person to be making these decisions. Parros got the stint through a connection as his background is simply a player. The league is a business and a committee costs too much money. Get the right person who understands a little about enacting justice in a fair way and it’s fine. The league to this point has been treating the position as a retired player job when it should be more deeper than that.