Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Honestly, no. I must have missed that post. I'll add it to my viewing list. But does that change the fact that he lied about education, was convicted of prostitution, and illegal sales? I like my sources for ideas to at least have some credibility. If he lies about degrees, why should I waste any time on anything else he has to say? What are the odds it's truthful?
|
He didn't lie about his education. Nor did he lie about where he worked. Knapp and Corbel were able to dig in and validate the documents Lazar was able to present to support his claims. The government has gone out of its way to discredit Lazar and his claims about Area 51, and that includes drummed up charges on things he did not do.
Since we're going to play the odds game... What are the odds that someone who did not work at Los Alamos be able to take people on a tour of a secure facility and know every nook and cranny and many of the people who worked there? What are the odds that person's name would show up in a company directory? What are the odds that a person who was not able to study these devices be able to explain in great detail their inner workings and how the propulsion system worked? What are the odds that someone would be able to explain the use of an undiscovered element, explain the composition of that element in great detail, all over a decade before its discovery? What are the odds that an individual would be able to take multiple people to a location where they would observe UFOs in the restricted airspace to minutes of precision? What are the odds of that individual passing multiple polygraphs? What are the odds of others being able to confirm his narratives and that he was there if he were just making things up? Maybe do a little more than look something up on Wikipedia? You're better than that.