It's normally the opposite scenario I thought where people would "accidentally" burn, bulldoze, cut things like historical buildings, trees, etc. and go "oopsies, our bad, nothing we can do now but go ahead with our planned development" (which is why some people thought the Enoch Sale House fire was a bit convenient even though it probably was just an accident by a squatter).
To not allow someone to build back up to where they were before the fire just seems stupid. I know there was some "modernization" but if it didn't significantly change the layout, I'm entirely against the decision.
|