Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
I've laid out a scenario that I think is a reasonable possibility. I'm sorry you find someone to hold a different view than you to be an absurd thing to understand.
And frankly I don't care what the poll says. It is interesting to capture the sense of the fan base, but I don't think it makes you any more or less right. Or me for that matter.
|
Yes I get this.
I fully recognize that we both don’t know the full details what goes on behind the scenes, and we both have in idea in our heads of how things happened
I respect the reasoning behind your scenario, and at the same time, while I accept its plausibility, I look at my view of the probability.
Considering my observations and understandings about business, executives, people, hockey, politicians, public statements, corporate communications, etc., reconciled with what we have heard and seen, makes me land on the viewpoint that Tre was most likely, shall we say, given direction on his coaching change.
Absurd is perhaps too strong of a word for your liking, so my apologies, but it is kind of reflective of what I view as the probability that Sutter was Tre’s idea alone