Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
Those are a lot of ifs though Bingo. And you're right, we don't know everything.
What I believe we might agree upon is that the state of the club is highly disappointing and in the majority of instances, a GM who has been at the job for seven years would have had a major hand in that.
|
For sure ... but wanted to create an alternative where they wouldn't be disappointed because they were part of the problem themselves.
I forget who it was ... Friedman or Lebrun I think that said the word is the ownership is content with Treliving and they didn't see him going.
But as a group (ownership/management) they have to be disappointed. The plan didn't work. The idea that they had 2/3 of a first line to build around has completely fallen apart in the last two years and because of that they're sort of forced to retool.
If that is 100% on Treliving, and the ownership group was suggesting they move on from the duo sooner than yeah he could be in trouble. But if they were in concert with what was going on, than I'm guessing the owners and management are right along with myself and probably most of this site in not seeing that complete 13/23 collapse coming.
If that's the case they probably don't fire him.