Quote:
Originally Posted by Beatle17
Asked a question, thanks for your answer. My belief is Edwards has a better overall ability to build projects for up to $10B than consultants, who get paid quite well, on behalf of the city. CMLC isn't working for free or they would all be city employees.
|
So to get this clear, you don't think the underlying motivation (i.e. mission statements or alternate) of parties matter when it comes to who represents the City in this development?
Edit: And as another person said- what signs has Edwards shown in that the Flames can support any sort of development of this size?
The flames have been wholly incompetent on the arena debate for the last decade, i.e. the renderings they released. Its been an absolute embarrassment.
I am interested in your thoughts. Do you believe
-that Edwards primary interest in this project is increasing the Flames worth
- that CMLC primary interest in this project is developing a project that supports the Cities goals?
And your rational that because CMLC has staff who don't work for free.... therefore they don't want to protect the interest of the City? Is that what you are saying?
There is ALOT of dumb points in this thread, I think you get the award for making the dumbest point of them all.
Pro-arena because you like it? Sure, go for that position. To argue the Edwards managing it is in the best interest of the City.... I am just amazed. Thank you