Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Apparently it's not just that... it's also disagreements on scope (which somehow wasn't ironed out when they signed the deal). Remember how the deal was that everything outside the scope would be paid for by the side that wanted it? Not such a great idea when you rush the job and don't figure out what the scope is beforehand.
https://skyrisecities.com/forum/thre...1#post-1677048 |
No time for questions like that when council needs to get the vote done before their late summer break since they know the deal won't survive a few weeks of public scrutiny.