Quote:
Originally posted by Red+Dec 12 2004, 02:10 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Red @ Dec 12 2004, 02:10 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by calf@Dec 12 2004, 02:07 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Red
|
Quote:
@Dec 12 2004, 01:52 PM
The government should not allow gay marriage because they can't produce future taxpayers like MOST of hetero marriages do. How's that for a reason to deny gay marriage that's not based on the evil bible or any other religeous fear mongering nonsense that you pimplefaced university students HATE so much? 
|
They can adopt a child or have a surrogate mother/father.
and if they don't allow it, the government loses out on the registration fee from issuing the license too
|
You are not understanding me. Most governments want you to reproduce so they can have more tax payers. Adoption has nothing to do with reproduction. [/b][/quote]
Perhaps...but they can raise a future taxpayer that a straight couple chose not to keep.
I noticed you totally ignored my surrogate mother/father arguement. Why is that? That's all about the reproduction there.
...and again, the government would lose out on the registration fee as well...hmmm
so to answer your original question: that's horrible reasoning.