Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
The Marskstrom move can most definitely be questioned as it was not a slam dunk good move. Not saying it was a mistake but I think it can be debated.
Just like some of his moves that failed can certainly be defended.
|
Agreed. It's not so much about the move itself in a vacuum, it's that it was another window shortening move. Probably the same can be said about Tanev. I wonder how much being in a 7 team division with 2 likely bad teams (VAN, OTT) enticed them into one my try?
The right move would've been to weaponize cap space and roll the dice on a 2 year re-tool, most of which will be in empty arenas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I don't get why we haven't seen something else tried with the defense pairings.
Understand why you leave Tanev and Hanifin together, but when two coaches pretty much left that other pairing to suffer you just shake your head.
Ward had him with Valimaki for three or four games, and it really worked.
I'd love to see if it's Giordano losing a step that's tanking the duo, or Andersson.
|
Hanifin-Andersson (hope to start your decade of Keith+Seabrook)
Valimaki-Tanev
Gio-Kylington
seems like the best option for development.