Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Yeah the series of:
Sign Raymond
Buyout Raymond
Sign Brouwer
Buyout Brower
Sign Stone
Buyout Stone
Sign Neal
Trade Neal for Lucic
There's no way you can't look at that and level some valid criticism at the GM. I think the Stone one gets overblown as he was effective until his clotting issues.
But there's a common theme where the pro scouting or analytics with the team seem flawed. With the scouting, the amateur scouting seems improved - but the pro scouting consistently has led to questionable decisions. Is it the scouts or what they are being asked to prioritize?
And then on the analytics side, has that department disagreed with the decisions and they aren't listened to? Or are they ignored? What is being tracked and measured and has it proven to be an effective means to evaluate players?
Hard to know where the problems actually are, and ultimately the GM is accountable but if there are more root causes in play, swapping the GM won't do much.
It's also the reason why I say if you are going to fire the GM, don't had the keys to someone on his team (e.g. Conroy) who has been a part of the group that has made the decisions that have led you to fire the GM.
|
The two single biggest issues the team faces stem from the failure of Bennett to pan out into a 1C and the signing of James Neal. The picks traded for Hamonic (and lesser picks) do not impact the present struggles anywhere near like those two things. To some degree Neal was mitigated but not nearly as it could have been.