I'm just curious to the opinion here, especially on the topic of how refs are justifying what's a penalty and for what reason it may be a penalty.
This just happened to Couture in the LA vs Sharks game. I would say a clean hit from Jeff Carter, but just a bad angle and rough outcome for Couture.
How in the hell is this called high sticking???
How does a ref justify a penalty for that after the play had been made and nothing was called or maybe seen initially?
Mind boggling to try and understand how strange the officiating of the NHL has become in the last few years.
__________________
|