Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
I never mentioned monkey to compuer user eveolution.
I mean money to X to Y to Z to man evolution theory. I assume using Darwinian forces to guide evolution.
According to the BBC that theory still exists althought it has changed some what:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4991470.stm
What other theory is there that indicates man is not an offshoot (perhaps very distant) of a monkey?
MYK |
Did you read the article? It says it in the first line. "
Humans and chimpanzees may have split away from a common ancestor far more recently than was previously thought."
It's not monkey, x, y ,z, man.. it's a common ancestor where two groups of that ancestor diverged over time eventually becoming separate species. It's more like millions of shades of colours instead of red then green then blue then orange (if colours were "species").
How is it possible to argue against something when the very basics of that thing aren't understood?