Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
I think any system that awards a different amount of points in games is fundamentally flawed.
So, I favour the 3-2-1 system.
Rewards teams that win in regulation. I actually like the loser point, as that point needs to go somewhere.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
OTOH, I think that any system that awards the same number of points for a skills competition as a 60 minute game is fundamentally flawed, and any system that awards half as many points for a loss as a win is also fundamentally flawed. Even the current system has different amounts of points awarded in games, because a game can be 2 or 3 points. The only value in having the current system is that it sets out the maximum points obtainable as 164 points in a normal season, regardless of how those wins are obtained. In a 3-2-1 system, the only difference is that to obtain the maximum number of points, all wins have to be in regulation rather than in circus time or the skills competition. What's wrong with that?