So much depends on the goal of the boycott.
If it is to take a moral stand, then by all means, have at it, as there are more than enough examples to justify taking a stand against China.
If it is to make any difference on how the games are viewed or if is to change China’s behaviour? I think it is largely an empty gesture and basically pointless.
What I don’t really understand, is the issues surrounding Meng’s extradition. How strong is the US case? This seems to be driving most of the conversation (at least when it comes to the Michaels), that I would prefer Canada to address that issue head on.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|