Guys, do we really need to have a back and forth analytical conversation about the motives and justifications behind suggesting a brown hockey player could only be found while searching the mountains of Afghanistan?
It's like someone threw a hand grenade into a barn, and y'all are standing around like,
"well, I mean, sure it was a hand grenade, but it fairness there was a slight chance it was a dud, so it's not like the guy 100% intended to blow up the barn..."
Edit: Whoops. This is what happens when I try to catch up in a thread and wind up responding to something that's already over.