Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Sure you could. And some of the names probably deserve to be there. But it's only a useful list if all the names deserve to be there.
If stats aren't accurate, they are less valuable than random numbers (because people will use them, believing they are accurate)
|
I agree with you . I don't pretend to understand their methodology so I wouldn't be able to say whether this particular list is
1. totally random (seems unlikely)
2. based partially in truth but with a lot of noise and error (unhelpful)
3. mostly a reflection of a mix of either guys who are truly useless and guys who just get a lot of icetime and are a bit deficient on the defensive side
4. completely accurate
I doubt its 1 or 4.