Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
There have been numerous examples of players and teams mutually agreeing to terminate contracts. The key is that both parties have to agree to terminate the contract.
I don't think there is anything in the CBA that expressly forbids them from signing Kane again after terminating the contract. However one could make the case that by voiding the contract and then signing him again the Sharks are re-negotiating Kane's contract which is not allowed per the CBA. Depends on how the NHL and NHLPA will want to interpret and enforce the clause.
That being said this is more than likely a negotiating tactic for settling the debts. Kane's lawyers are threatening to take away the main source for the creditors to recoup their money and trying to get them to take pennies on the dollars they are owed.
|
Yeah, I came to say this.
This is so, so greasy.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|