Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
I hate this. This is cap circumvention. If Seabrook cant play, he should retire. he shouldnt get all of the money still while being camped on IR. The hawks need some sort of penalty enforced against this.
|
Why?
If Seabrook was healthy, he could play.
If Seabrook was healthy, he would play.
The guy has one of the best jobs on earth that he’s done his entire life and he gets paid millions. His legacy is secure.
He wouldn’t just give that up because the team is not ripping off championships anymore. What does that matter to him? He gets to keep his awesome job and make his money.
Except his body won’t let him anymore.
I don’t want to punish teams for signing players. I want teams to be able to move on from players. Player movement and transactions are good for the game. There needs to be a better way for teams and players to divorce, without it becoming this goofy discussion every time a guy north of 35 decides he can’t play in the best league in the world anymore.