Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan
Here's a list of low hanging fruit and recycled complaints.
Look, there is a certain percentage of people on this forum who will find fault in almost anything. They're just wired to incessantly whine and make no mistake, they will start once again if Treliving were to be replaced.
Bottom line, the organization is better today than it was when Treliving took over. Perhaps that is why he has not be fired. We only make our judgements based on what we see from our couch. There is a enormous amount of real estate between what we see/hear and what is actually happening in the offices of the Saddledome. How is Treliving evaluated? How is he evaluated by the fans, which should mean next to nothing, vs how is he evaluated by the organization? I bet there is a substantial difference.
If you want the truth of it though, you would have to ask Bean or Edwards. Good luck.
|
Not exactly sure how you can come to that conclusion. When Treliving took over they were an ascending team. Today they are a declining team. There's not a team in Canada that would trade their roster for the Flames as teams like Ottawa and Vancouver at least know better days are ahead.