Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan
Here's a list of low hanging fruit and recycled complaints.
Look, there is a certain percentage of people on this forum who will find fault in almost anything. They're just wired to incessantly whine and make no mistake, they will start once again if Treliving were to be replaced.
Bottom line, the organization is better today than it was when Treliving took over. Perhaps that is why he has not be fired. We only make our judgements based on what we see from our couch. There is a enormous amount of real estate between what we see/hear and what is actually happening in the offices of the Saddledome. How is Treliving evaluated? How is he evaluated by the fans, which should mean next to nothing, vs how is he evaluated by the organization? I bet there is a substantial difference.
If you want the truth of it though, you would have to ask Bean or Edwards. Good luck.
|
Why do you think the team is better today then on the day he took over?
On ice performance we are not. Cap flexibility we are not. Prospects - Arguable but I would say on par (Most people have us ranked in the 20th range for farm system)
What is the 'better' in your mind?