Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I don’t listen to “the guy” at all. The reasons for his moves are pretty obvious. And I criticize him plenty - the Neal signing, the Stone contract, etc. And I’ve said a bunch of times that this is a results league and he is missing results so he can go.
You are just making up things to justify a weird dislike for him based on some sort of “incompetence” rationale, when he’s made pretty standard moves. Incompetence is when you don’t know the rules of the CBA, or when you draft a guy so out of position the league laughs at you, not when you fail to overpay for a failed trade you can’t even identify.
If Treliving is always unwilling to pay a price for a player, explain Hamonic, Hamilton, Markstrom, Tanev. Explain the trades people cite as reasons to fire him.
|
If BT was the Oilers GM and made all the same moves for the past 7 years and this was the end result we would all be laughing at them and praying they don't fire him.
7 years of no playoff success, team with no cap flexibility, on coach 4, playing the most uninspired, boring, and terrible hockey in the league.
We have become the Oilers we laughed at for the past decade