Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I don’t listen to “the guy” at all. The reasons for his moves are pretty obvious. And I criticize him plenty - the Neal signing, the Stone contract, etc. And I’ve said a bunch of times that this is a results league and he is missing results so he can go.
You are just making up things to justify a weird dislike for him based on some sort of “incompetence” rationale, when he’s made pretty standard moves. Incompetence is when you don’t know the rules of the CBA, or when you draft a guy so out of position the league laughs at you, not when you fail to overpay for a failed trade you can’t even identify.
If Treliving is always unwilling to pay a price for a player, explain Hamonic, Hamilton, Markstrom, Tanev. Explain the trades people cite as reasons to fire him.
|
He's been trying to build a winning team for 7 years. The team is as bad as it's ever been. That's basically a definition of incompetence.
I don't have a dislike for the guy, I just wanted to point out how he failed to bring that very important piece that's been needed for his entire tenure. I said that after someone pointed out that instead of addressing a need he went out to get Hamonic. Basically reiterating my point that Treliving did not follow his plan.
None of the above trades required a core player to complete the deal, only draft picks and cash. He has dealt many draft picks.
Anyways, I said what I wanted to say. You don't have to agree.