[Mathgod]

Originally Posted by afc wimbledon

Armstrong is the only rider to have his records expunged of all of the know and admitted dopers in his (and every other generation) of pro cycling, there isnt any whataboutery as I am making direct comparisons with other riders who have been busted and admitted exactly the same behaviour, whataboutery is when you compare two actions that are vaguely similer, these are all identical.

What Armstrong did went beyond just simple doping.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_...ng_doping_case

On October 10, USADA published the details of its investigation, in a 200-page report accompanied by over 1000 pages of supporting evidence. The report included testimonies from eleven former Armstrong teammates and fifteen other witnesses. It portrayed Armstrong as the mastermind of what it described as "the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen." The report detailed numerous blood test results that proved Armstrong was guilty of blood doping, as well as over US$1 million in payments to Ferrari. It contended that the normal eight-year statute of limitations for doping offenses did not apply because of Armstrong's "fraudulent concealment" of his doping. Armstrong, USADA said, could not be allowed to benefit from the statute when he lied under oath in both the SCA case and the French investigation, intimidated witnesses and submitted affidavits that he knew were false. Longstanding precedent in U.S. courts holds that the statute of limitations does not apply when a defendant engages in fraudulent acts.[26][27][28]