I'm sorry, am I supposed to believe that someone who:
- Continuously claims the $1400 cheques are actually $2000 (which they are not)
- Would rather see people who desperately need them go without until we can be sure people who don't need them don't receive them, even if it takes many months
- Defends this based on the completely manufactured idea that these people will actually get more than the $1400 if they wait (which is not on the table)
- And would also be happier if even some people who need them don't get them, so long as the number of recipients who don't need them is also reduced
... is the one taking a humanitarian approach, in-touch with reality, and who actually cares about people affected? I mean, strong "lol" here. This is some fantasyland stuff.
|