Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
Yes, we likely disagree.
I think the team is capable of something closer to the results they got in the first 3/4 season of 2 years ago than the .500 bone dry ineffective hockey that we are seeing now.
|
Genuinely curious as to why, when the two years preceding that, and then following the allstar/cba break they were pretty much the same thing.
One is a much bigger sample size than the other, but you think the smaller one is more indicative of what they should be. Im just not sure how that adds up.
I guess I would frame it this way..
If Bill Peters was brought back (sans all the noise he has around him), do you think the club would resemble that 60 game segment before the break, or the one we have seen before that and since?