Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Jesus ####ing Christ, this stuff is getting stupid and old. A nine asset for two asset trade. Then a five asset for one asset trade. Zero thought as to why teams would do such things or the impacts those deals would have the health of the organization, just do it "for the hell of it." We need a couple of wins just so people will stop posting this nonsense.
|
Those trades take in $5.1M in extra salary (not possible), plus we would be left with no 1st, 2nd or 3rd next year, no 1st, 2nd or 3rd the next year, and no 1st or 2nd the year after that. And we included this year's 1st.
lol