LMFAO softball Q from Hawley, the most favourable senator possible for the defence team, regarding the constitutional legality of disqualifying someone from future office without removing them from said office (not a great question IMO, but has some basis for merit.) This question is essentially trying to lead the proverbial horses to water and give the repub senators something to point to and say thats why we voted to acquit.
van der Veen just says no then tries to make a very tangential jab about how one of the house managers misrepresented a Trump tweet that he had read verbatim.
You can't make this up. It's very likely that Trump would have actually been better defending himself. No doubt that even Giuliani could have mustered a better defense.
|