I can't speak for most people, but I myself would not like hockey nearly as much if I didn't actually like players and cheered for those players. It provides extra passion for me as a fan. What the heck is wrong with loving certain players, even after they move on? This is some kind of a weird weakness?
I don't think I could care as much about hockey if it ALL came down to simple wins/losses. If you think of it that way, then how could anyone possibly enjoy having been a Flames' fan outside of the '89 season?
Players add personality to the game, another point of interest, and just more to cheer about. If that was taken out, I would certainly enjoy hockey way less - maybe to the point where I become just a casual fan who watches when nothing else is on.
For me, part of the enjoyment about hockey is watching players grow, their struggles, their accomplishments, etc. That's how you make it 'fun' as a fan whether this team is winning championships, or rebuilding. Taking that element out just makes it feel sterile and cold, and there is just so much less excitement and passion.
I cheered hard for Joey Mullen and Badger Bob on the Pens, and I loved watching them hoist the cup. Loved watching Nieuwendyk hoist it with Dallas as well. I cheered for Iginla to win it, and I am disappointed that he didn't. That makes me 'less of a fan'? Well, that's ok if I am. I seem to be enjoying hockey quite a lot, so I hope I don't become a bigger fan then.
|