What I'm curious to know but will probably never learn is why CGY has been correct. In that, I'm wondering if there is a layer(s) of sophistication with CGY's analytics (Chris Snow's FlamesVision) that are beyond the level of analysis used in public (non team, non proprietary).
My view of analytics has always been they are very useful (I very much understand and appreciate their value as a part of the debate) but what is currently used (and how used) is rather unsophisticated.
Even with Snow (best wishes to him), when he has spoken about analytics he uses language that people miss - analyzing in 3 dimensions in real time etc. This is really intriguing to me. What does he mean?
I mean it could have been CGY loved Tanev's intangibles for all I know but I think it's more - it's in their proprietary analysis. I could be wrong but at the end of the day I like Tanev so who cares!
|