Quote:
Originally posted by FlamesAddiction@Dec 10 2004, 06:06 PM
I read a book about Bernardo and Homolka. While it's true that he smacked her around, she was evidently one of those freaky chicks that had a fetish for it. There were also some videos where she was the one forcing the girls to do things to her.
The thing I don't understand is that Bernardo was so obviously guilty. There was a magnitude of physical evidence - so why did they even need to offer Homolka a deal for her testimony? It makes no sense.
|
The found the evidence shorty after (very shortly) here plea bargin. Prior to the plea bargain they had not found the tapes.