Quote:
Originally Posted by csnarpy
The statement that they kept saying was that the trip changed his approach angle to the net and he originally would not have gone into Markstrom. On that, I call BS. After watching that clip many times, how he avoids the blue paint would have been a miracle. He was going full tilt and his angle was pretty much apparent.
I figure he was hoping for a goal and then no penalty for taking out our goalie would have been called.
Unfortunately for him, he forgot about a little thing called defence and that can ruin your plans. Tanev went for the puck and hit that first. Not his fault that your careless and tripped over his stick. Just how i see it.
|
Yup...he was gonna smoke Markstrom one way or the other and he was doing it on purpose.
Simple answer to that whole hypothetical they were trying to arrive at?
Physics.... stupid.
It would have been much worse had he gone in standing up.
If he tries it again...i hope the dmen take his feet out if thats what it comes down to. Have to protect the G. Eventually he will stop.