Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
But a player having experience shouldn’t be the determining factor then either.
Froese is a known quantity. He’s not going to do anything of consequence but he’s also not as likely to hurt you. He’s a no upside player at this point of his career.
Gawdin is more unknown. He could be a player that actually had some impact, but his downside isn’t known either so teams don’t want to take the risk.
It’s just a GM and coach playing it safe, that’s it.
Personally I’d take the potential upside of Gawdin over the no upside of Froese at this point. And I think Gawdin would be more likely to help us win a game than Froese would too.
|
So would I, I thanked your post in agreement on the last page. But I also know way less about each players abilities than those in the organization.