Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
No, it is not a coincidence that during/(or before) a game between the Canadiens and the Flames, Elliott Friedman (in his own words) reached out to Darren Ferris and asked about the satisfaction level of players who would be playing (or sitting in the press box) during that game, who he represents, who both obviously need a change of scenery.
The agent didn't reach out to Friedman nor did he go on a twitter diatribe.
So much context keeps getting omitted.
|
The agent could say nothing.
When you say your player needs a change, you’ve disadvantaged the team.
Now opposing GMs know the player wants out.
I don’t like that Bennett was scratched and that his value is deteriorating but the agent got this ball rolling.
He has no obligation to comment just because the media asks. In fact, his first obligation is to not comment until he clears it with his client; that’s suppose to be how these relationships work. So did he clear it first, then approach Friedman to induce a question so he can make a comment?