Quote:
Originally Posted by dobbles
So I watched the video, and the only 2 things I would say he even takes issue with are 1) that Trump also uses slapp suits to his benefit and 2) that Oliver did not fully characterize all of the complaints that were in the suit against him.
Seems really really really really thin to me if this is the only example we have so far. The first point Stone agrees with what Oliver says about Trump but just points out that he has used slapp to his benefit. To me that wasn't even so much of a disagreement, just a clarification. The second point at least has a little bit of validity if the argument is 'John Oliver misleads people' in that he did characterize the suit as primarily about the 'eat sh$t bob' comments and not all the other claims. But in Stones video he screencapped several of the claims and one I noticed was labelled 45. So I do not exactly hold it against Oliver for not thoroughly addressing at least 45 claims.
Overall Stone repeatedly confirms that was Oliver said was accurate and has 1 nit picky challenge. I'm not even sure that registers as a 1/10 on the outrage scale.
|
I never said I was outraged. I said I think Oliver is dangerous.
I have never heard of anyone being "outraged" about a show but also saying their enjoy it so much they don't miss an episode..