Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Good Backlund is a Selke candidate. And vastly under-rated.
But bad Backlund is a soft player that can be completely ineffective.
I like Backlund, but I think the variance in his level of play is too great. He needs to be mentally tougher. And harder to play against (all the time).
|
Bergeron is effective all the time. Backlund is not. The team depends on him to be a quality 2-way forward but he's only that player for half the season. It's why I think he should probably be left unprotected in the expansion draft.