View Single Post
Old 01-26-2021, 10:34 AM   #30
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Is that a typo? Because 6% would imply 1-16 and I can't imagine that WPG had an expected goals for of 16
Nope ... it's extreme but correct.

xGF is a build of different types of shot attempts analyzed against success rates to build a total goals for.

Lucic in that game had a scant .03 ... which is just a whisker over nothing. They generated zilch when he was on the ice.

His xGA in that game though was 0.54, which was in the middle of the team ... not terrible, not great.

.03/.57 = 6%

When a guy generates nothing, and manages to give up an expected half goal with only 8 minutes of five on five ice time it stands out.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post: