Babcock's own explanation sounds so ridiculous. It sounds like a prepared answer for a job interview, frankly.
If he actually handled the situation the way he describes, the story would never have seen the light of the day as it'd be a non-event, even in hindsight. He knows Marner won't talk about it, but Marner should burn him by setting straight what actually occurred. It really was a story of putting a different angle on it and acknowledging it could've been handled perfectly had he taken the extra step, but he did all he could under the circumstances. Only his version is nonsense. Has anyone tweeted Commodore for his inside scoop on what actually happened? He doesn't hold back.
|