Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritime Q-Scout
Last I read M4A would be more cost efficient than the current system. As in it would cost the US Government less than they're paying now. That was from a Koch Brother's study.
Do you have a source on the spending costs?
I also think if the US were to switch to M4A it would be a process and not a flip of a switch.
|
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...-over-10-years
It's hard to say if it would cost less. Are you eliminating all private care? The middleman so to speak? In Canada, public and private co-exist. All Canadian have supplementary packages such as dental, vision, drugs, physio et cetera.
How would this co-existing work (if at all) in a universal health care system in America?