View Single Post
Old 01-11-2021, 11:35 AM   #33
iggy_oi
Franchise Player
 
iggy_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Okay then good luck getting the owners to agree to that. Removing a player's cap hit while still paying them salary is bypassing 50/50 revenue split and giving the players a larger share.
I could see a lot of the big money teams actually wanting to see something like that implemented.

They already did away with the 50/50 revenue split guarantee in the new CBA extension, albeit with the league’s intention of going back to that in the next CBA. The league has also already agreed in the past to things like compliance buyouts which put salaries over their 50/50 split in the past so I don’t think they’re stuck on the 50/50 split in situations where it’s to their benefit to deviate from it.

On Hoffman, this is a steal for St. Louis
iggy_oi is offline   Reply With Quote