Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin
What? It was literally announced as a way to recoup some lost revenue. Also, I 'm not quite sure what a "make good on the part of the team" even means.  |
My understanding is that Scotiabank (or whoever) pays X amount of dollars for so many guaranteed home games or TV dates. When those aren't provided, rather than refunding money, the NHL teams aren't charging money for helmet ads, instead giving up this season as a make good on money owed.
Found this, not sure it matches what I thought so my apologies if I was off
https://twitter.com/user/status/1341037000095371264